“Alexander: The Making of a God” is a meticulously crafted documentary series now streaming on Netflix, which explores the life and times of one of history’s most iconic figures, Alexander the Great. This engaging series uses a blend of insightful interviews with historians and beautifully staged reenactments to recount the story of a ruler whose military acumen and ambition extended his empire across three continents. Featuring performances by Buck Braithwaite, Mido Hamada, and Agni Scott, the show offers an in-depth look at Alexander’s journey from a young king to a military legend, achieving unprecedented conquests until his premature death at 32. Designed for a TV-14 audience, the series not only charts the tactical brilliance and relentless drive of Alexander but also examines the complex legacy of a man who was, in many ways, deified by history.

In a recent discussion, Dr. Paul Cartledge, a prominent historian from the University of Cambridge with a focus on Ancient Greece, shared his insights on Alexander the Great, touching on his personal connections and how he is portrayed in a Netflix series.

Personal Connections

Dr. Cartledge highlighted the significant roles of Hephaestion and Ptolemy in Alexander’s life, underscoring the depth of their relationships. He specifically delved into the bond between Alexander and Hephaestion, cautioning against simplifying their relationship as merely homosexual. “Alexander’s relationships with Hephaestion and Ptolemy were undoubtedly important, but we must be careful when characterizing them through a contemporary prism. While their bond was deep, reducing it to mere homosexuality oversimplifies the complexity of their connection,” Dr. Cartledge remarked.

He stressed the importance of considering their relationship within the context of ancient Greek norms, where same-sex intimacy was not necessarily sexual. Dr. Cartledge advocates for a nuanced understanding that goes beyond modern sexual categories, focusing on the aspects of friendship, guidance, and companionship prevalent in their time. “Understanding the dynamics of Alexander’s relationships requires a differentiated approach that takes into account the cultural context of Ancient Greece and the conventions of companionship and loyalty that prevailed in his time. It is important not to impose modern notions of sexuality on historical figures without careful consideration,” he stated.

Dr. Cartledge also pointed out the influence of Alexander’s close relationships on his leadership and decision-making, highlighting the loyalty and support he received from his inner circle.

Netflix’s Portrayal of Alexander

Discussing the Netflix series on Alexander the Great, Dr. Cartledge addressed the challenge of balancing historical accuracy with the demands of entertainment. He acknowledged the series’ role in drawing interest to ancient history but warned against the potential for historical distortion.

“As attractive as dramatizations like the Netflix series on Alexander the Great are, we should not sacrifice historical integrity for the sake of spectacle. Viewers should approach the series with a critical eye, distinguishing fiction from reality,” he advised.

He urged viewers to critically engage with the series, appreciating its artistic elements while remaining mindful of historical nuances and the limitations of our knowledge about the ancient world. “Artistic liberties are inevitable in dramatizations, but it is necessary to achieve a balance between entertainment and accuracy. We risk distorting history when we prioritise sensationalism over truth,” Dr. Cartledge commented.Dr. Cartledge emphasized the value of approaching historical dramas with discernment, advocating for a balance that fosters a deeper understanding of historical complexities.

Alexander’s Final Resting Place

The quest to locate the final resting place of Alexander the Great remains a topic of intense interest for historians and archaeologists alike. Dr. Cartledge sheds light on the compelling nature of this pursuit, pointing out the various hypotheses and exploratory missions that have been undertaken in an effort to solve the mystery.

Throughout history, there have been numerous conjectures regarding the location of Alexander’s tomb. Some believe it lies in Babylon, where he passed away, while others argue that his remains were transported back to Macedonia, Greece, his homeland. Despite significant archaeological endeavors, conclusive proof to support either theory has yet to surface. Dr. Cartledge acknowledges the dedication of archaeologists, such as Dr. Kalliopi Limnaeu-Papakosta, in this pursuit and offers a thoughtful perspective: “The search for Alexander’s tomb transcends the mere uncovering of historical facts; it represents a deep dive into our collective intrigue and our enduring connection with history.”

In conclusion, Netflix’s series “Alexander: The Making of a God” offers a unique blend of historical narrative and dramatic storytelling, inviting viewers into the complex world of one of history’s most iconic figures. While the series navigates the fine line between entertainment and historical accuracy, it serves as a testament to Alexander the Great’s enduring legacy and the fascination he still holds today. By engaging with this series, audiences are given a glimpse into the life, achievements, and the unparalleled journey of Alexander, portrayed through a contemporary lens that both entertains and educates.

Something More?

For those captivated by the story of Alexander the Great and wishing to delve deeper into the facts, theories, and discussions surrounding his legendary exploits, we invite you to explore our article series on Alexander the Great. This collection offers comprehensive insights, scholarly analysis, and a closer look at the man behind the myth. Discover the historical context, the personal relationships, and the strategic genius of Alexander by visiting our series. Embark on a journey through time and uncover the layers of history that have made Alexander the Great a figure of endless intrigue and inspiration.

Did Alexander the great visited acropolis?

There is no historical evidence to confirm that Alexander the Great personally visited the Acropolis of Athens. While Alexander’s conquests and political maneuvers had significant impacts on the Greek city-states, including Athens, direct accounts of him visiting specific landmarks such as the Acropolis during his lifetime are not documented in the surviving historical texts. Alexander’s interactions with Athens were more political and military in nature, and his campaigns mainly focused on the vast expanse of the Persian Empire and beyond. The historical record focuses more on his battles, administration, and the aftermath of his empire’s expansion rather than on such specific personal movements.

Was Acropolis of Athens built when Alexander the Great lived?

Yes, the Acropolis of Athens was indeed present during the lifetime of Alexander the Great (356-323 BCE). The Acropolis, with its monumental buildings, most notably the Parthenon, had been constructed in the 5th century BCE, following the Persian Wars. This was well before Alexander’s time. The Parthenon and other structures on the Acropolis, such as the Erechtheion and the Temple of Athena Nike, were already significant cultural and religious symbols of Athens and the wider Greek world during Alexander’s era.

Alexander’s era came after the classical period of Athens, during which the city experienced its peak in terms of cultural, economic, and military power, partly symbolized by the construction of the Acropolis’s iconic buildings. By the time Alexander embarked on his campaigns to create an empire that stretched from Greece to Egypt and into Asia, the Acropolis served as a testament to Athens’ former glory and its enduring cultural significance in the Greek world.